Re: All I wanted was git-fast-export

[Paul Gardiner <osronline@glidos.net>]

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [please do not look the other way when you respond to me, i.e. do not cull 
> me from the Cc: list.  Thankyouverymuch]
> 
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Paul Gardiner wrote:
> 
>> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>>> The thing is, filter-branch was _written for this purpose_.  So if you 
>>> know what commit you rewrote last, you can make the process 
>>> faster/safer by issuing
>>>
>>> 	$ git filter-branch --msg-filter="<blabla>" <old-commit>..master
>> That does look just what I need, but did you see the reason I thought I 
>> couldn't use it? I need to repeatedly sync the git repository from a 
>> live cvs repository, and repeatedly filter the new commit messages.
> 
> Oh, I thought you saw why I put in that "<old-commit>...".  You do not 
> really need it, as filter-branch will come up with the _same_ commit 
> hashes, unless _something_ was changed.
> 
> IOW if you have only commits without that "Summary: " prefix, the 
> filter-branch call will be a (not so cheap) no-op.
> 
> But of course, I meant to suggest (admittedly, in a very short short-hand) 
> that you use "git filter-branch ... origin@{1}..origin" after cvsimport.

I'm still struggling a bit to understand ref specs. I'm using --all at
the moment, but that's very slow. What I need is to filter the new
commits of all branches. Will origin@{1}..origin do that, or does
it just affect master?

P.