From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JR5Vj-00035l-KI for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:54:19 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JR5Vh-000338-9z for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:54:17 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JR5Vf-00030k-Ib for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:54:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JR5Vf-00030M-AF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:54:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de ([134.147.32.86]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JR5Ve-0005Z4-Dd for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:54:14 -0500 X-Queued: (qmail 7934 invoked by uid 281); 18 Feb 2008 12:54:12 -0000 X-Qmailscanner: from 134.147.252.214 by mx1.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (envelope-from , uid 80) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (sophie: 3.05/2.52/4.24. Clear:RC:1(134.147.252.214):. Processed in 0.079076 secs); 18 Feb 2008 12:54:12 -0000 Received: from router.leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (134.147.252.214) by mx1.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with SMTP; 18 Feb 2008 12:54:11 -0000 Received: from [134.147.55.45] (frodo.leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.55.45]) by router.leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id m1ICxX1l002008 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:59:33 +0100 Message-ID: <47B9800B.3090700@leat.rub.de> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:35 +0100 From: Fabian Greffrath User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <47B19C57.9020902@leat.rub.de> <20080213154224.GB30040@thorin> <47B32029.200@leat.rub.de> <20080213193534.GA28711@thorin> <47B3FCEC.6020107@leat.rub.de> <20080217134219.GB15576@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20080217134219.GB15576@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add option to grub-probe to accept system devices as arguments X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:54:17 -0000 Robert Millan schrieb: > I mean that it should find the disk that contains /dev/hda1 device _node_. Maybe, but I do not believe this has anything to do with my patch. > Is the same output supposed to be printed in all "???" ? If not, what is in > each one? In all of these cases the 'if (S_ISBLK (st.st_mode))' test introduced by my patch will fail and thus grub-probe's behaviour will be exactly as before.