From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
LKML <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: very poor ext3 write performance on big filesystems?
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:02:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B99E0C.8020706@wpkg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080218141640.GC12568@mit.edu>
Theodore Tso schrieb:
(...)
>> What has helped a bit was to recreate the file system with -O^dir_index
>> dir_index seems to cause more seeks.
>
> Part of it may have simply been recreating the filesystem, not
> necessarily removing the dir_index feature.
You mean, copy data somewhere else, mkfs a new filesystem, and copy data
back?
Unfortunately, doing it on a file level is not possible with a
reasonable amount of time.
I tried to copy that filesystem once (when it was much smaller) with
"rsync -a -H", but after 3 days, rsync was still building an index and
didn't copy any file.
Also, as files/hardlinks come and go, it would degrade again.
Are there better choices than ext3 for a filesystem with lots of
hardlinks? ext4, once it's ready? xfs?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-18 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-18 12:57 very poor ext3 write performance on big filesystems? Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-18 14:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 14:16 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-18 15:02 ` Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2008-02-18 15:16 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-18 15:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 15:35 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-20 10:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-20 17:44 ` David Rees
2008-02-20 18:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-18 16:16 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-18 18:45 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-18 15:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 15:03 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-19 14:54 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-19 15:06 ` Chris Mason
2008-02-19 15:21 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-19 16:04 ` Chris Mason
2008-02-19 18:29 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-19 18:41 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-19 18:58 ` Paulo Marques
2008-02-19 22:33 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-27 11:20 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-27 20:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-02-27 20:25 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-03-01 20:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-02-19 9:24 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
[not found] <9YdLC-75W-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9YeRh-Gq-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9Yf0W-SX-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9YfNi-2da-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9YfWL-2pZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9Yg6H-2DJ-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-02-19 13:14 ` Paul Slootman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B99E0C.8020706@wpkg.org \
--to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.