From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erez Zilber Subject: Throughput when using multibus Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:46:43 +0200 Message-ID: <47BACFB3.5040300@Voltaire.COM> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: "dm-devel@redhat.com" List-Id: dm-devel.ids Hi, I'd like to use my storage in active/active mode. I connected a machine with 2 FC cables to a switch and connected the FC storage with 2 cables to the same switch. I expected to get higher throughput from the device in active/active mode, but I get the same performance like I had without multipath. Here's the conf file that I use: defaults { polling_interval 5 failback immediate no_path_retry 3 user_friendly_names yes path_grouping_policy multibus } I see the device 4 times (which is ok): path7 (3600c0ff000d508d7dff2894701000000) DotHill,R/Evo 2730-2R [size=82G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0] \_ round-robin 0 [prio=4][active] \_ 8:0:3:8 sdah 66:16 [active][ready] \_ 9:0:1:8 sdar 66:176 [active][ready] \_ 9:0:3:8 sdbb 67:80 [active][ready] \_ 8:0:1:8 sdx 65:112 [active][ready] BTW - I see the both FC ports of the FC storage are used, but with low utilization. Erez