From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nausicaa2.coritel.it (host254-130-static.190-82-b.business.telecomitalia.it [82.190.130.254]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3CDDDFB0 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:12:53 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (nausicaa2.coritel.it [127.0.0.1]) by nausicaa2.coritel.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C572943400C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:10:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from nausicaa2.coritel.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nausicaa2.coritel.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OxVMuNhaHxZq for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:10:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (217-133-82-13.b2b.tiscali.it [217.133.82.13]) by nausicaa2.coritel.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67029434001 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:10:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47BC51B5.50204@coritel.it> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:13:41 +0100 From: Marco Stornelli MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LinuxPPC-Embedded Subject: Re: MPC8641D PCI-Express error Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kumar Gala wrote: >> Marco Stornelli wrote: >> >>> No, but I can try to backport the PCI-E code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18 >>> if it could help. What do you think about it? Do you think this >>> problem could be not present in 2.6.24? >>> I have no idea there, honestly. Sorry. >As Jon said, try 2.6.24 and see if it has an issue, if so we can look >at helping. if not, you know you need to back port the fixes. >- k I've "backported" the PCI-Express code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18, but it still doesn't work, I have the same problem (sigh), could you give me any suggestions? Thanks. Marco