From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Mark Mason <mason@postdiluvian.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: align shost->hostdata to cacheline
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:32:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BCE2D2.5030506@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1203101837.3058.34.camel@localhost.localdomain>
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 07:49 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 18:48 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> shost->hostdata can contain arbitrary data including DMA target
>>>> buffers. Align it to cacheline.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> James, what do you think?
>>> Hmm, it will blow out the host size ... although that's not such a huge
>>> problem since there are relatively few of them in most running kernels.
>>> What's the actual use case for this, though? The host structure is
>>> allocated in ordinary memory ... we don't make sure it's DMAable, and
>>> most HBAs that want to use memory for mailboxes need coherent memory
>>> anyway.
>> "As it can contain arbitrary structure, it should follow the largest
>> meaningful alignment to allow the contained structure proper alignment."
>> is the logic. I think it's generally RTTD for inline private data but
>> feel free to disagree.
>
> Well, the way we usually do that is to have the host float the alignment
> if necessary. The problem with relying on __cacheline_aligned for an
> allocated structure is that it only works if the allocated structure
> actually begins on a cacheline. Kmalloc (which is where we get the host
> from) doesn't necessarily obey this if certain slab debugging flags are
> present.
Hmmm... Right. That means libata either needs to create a separate slab
for the sector buf or align it after allocating by itself. Eeeek.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-12 18:02 libata/sata_sil24 cache alignment problem? Mark Mason
2008-02-12 22:12 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-12 23:36 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-13 2:13 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-13 2:32 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-13 18:47 ` Mark Mason
2008-02-13 20:21 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-13 21:25 ` Mark Mason
2008-02-14 0:21 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-14 3:05 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-14 9:44 ` [PATCH] libata: align ap->sector_buf to cacheline Tejun Heo
2008-02-14 9:48 ` [PATCH] scsi: align shost->hostdata " Tejun Heo
2008-02-14 15:05 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-14 22:49 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-15 18:57 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-21 2:32 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-02-13 18:51 ` libata/sata_sil24 cache alignment problem? Mark Mason
2008-02-12 23:25 ` Thomas Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BCE2D2.5030506@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@postdiluvian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.