From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tao.ma Date: Fri Feb 22 01:03:36 2008 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Add inode stealing for ocfs2.V1 In-Reply-To: <47BE89FE.1090204@oracle.com> References: <20080222084149.GA29738@tma-pc1.cn.oracle.com> <47BE89FE.1090204@oracle.com> Message-ID: <47BE8FE1.4070901@oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com wengang wang wrote: > not know it clearly, but I remember when extending a file, meta is > allocated in extent_alloc instead of inode_alloc if necessary(correct me > if i am wrong). yes, extending a file using extent_alloc. But I'm stealing inode not extent block. So don't need to touch extent_alloc. > if so, do we need to take extent_alloc into consideration as well? This solution is just for inodes, not extents. > > thanks, > wengang. >