From: Christer Weinigel <christer@weinigel.se>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Update coding standard to avoid ungrepable printk format strings
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:55:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C017C4.20209@weinigel.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080222132612.GA11717@basil.nowhere.org>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> RFC: Update coding standard to avoid split up printk format strings
While we're talking about checkpatch.pl, I'd definitely like to teach
checkpatch about "list_for_each" and friends.
list_for_each is flow control, not a function call. I find it much
easier to see that something is a loop when there is a space between the
name and the parenthesis rather than when they are smashed together.
old patch follows
/Christer
checkpatch complains about the following:
WARNING: no space between function name and open parenthesis '('
#520: FILE: drivers/spi/spi_s3c24xx_dma.c:478:
+ list_for_each_entry (transfer, &message->transfers, transfer_list) {
which I think is a bit bogus since it actually is a for statement in
disguise. The following patch adds list_for_each to the list of things
that look like functions that it shouldn't complain about.
Index: linux-2.6.23/scripts/checkpatch.pl
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23.orig/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ linux-2.6.23/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ sub process {
# check for spaces between functions and their parentheses.
if ($line =~ /($Ident)\s+\(/ &&
- $1 !~
/^(?:if|for|while|switch|return|volatile|__volatile__|__attribute__|format|__extension__|Copyright)$/
&&
+ $1 !~
/^(?:if|for|while|switch|list_for_each.*|return|volatile|__volatile__|__attribute__|format|__extension__|Copyright)$/
&&
$line !~ /$Type\s+\(/ && $line !~ /^.\#\s*define\b/) {
WARN("no space between function name and open parenthesis '('\n" .
$herecurr);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-23 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-22 13:26 [RFC/PATCH] Update coding standard to avoid ungrepable printk format strings Andi Kleen
2008-02-22 13:53 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-22 14:01 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-22 15:02 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-22 16:58 ` Joe Perches
2008-02-23 12:55 ` Christer Weinigel [this message]
2008-02-25 5:29 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-02-25 5:30 ` Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C017C4.20209@weinigel.se \
--to=christer@weinigel.se \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.