From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [216.145.245.197] (helo=mx01.dls.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JT2Jb-0000vh-QH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:53:53 +0100 Received: from gw.mwester.net ([209.242.5.110] helo=[192.168.1.111]) by mx01.dls.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JT2JI-0002Sq-7X for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:53:32 -0600 Message-ID: <47C095CA.6060407@dls.net> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:53:14 -0600 From: "Mike (mwester)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1203793457.8255.5.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20080223223439.528c6997@widy.localdomain> <200802232241.01317.openembedded@haerwu.biz> In-Reply-To: <200802232241.01317.openembedded@haerwu.biz> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.145.245.197 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mwester@dls.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Uppercase overrides and parsing speed X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:53:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia Saturday, 23 of February 2008, Paul Sokolovsky napisał: > >> Koen Kooi wrote: >> > > >>> Didn't we also agree that variable names shouldn't include '_' at >>> all? >>> >> How is that achievable? LETSUSEITLIKETHIS? Maybe exclude 'A' too? ;-) >> > > LETS-USE-IT-LIKE-THIS was one of suggestions. > > Oh come on, now - you can't be serious. It's just not difficult enough or arcane enough with any of those choices! We need to insist on this syntax for variables: LET\'S\ USE\ IT\ LIKE\ THIS ;-) :-P Didn't there used to be some recommendation for a variable naming convention that encoded the type into the name? Somehow all these restrictions on the use of case and underscores reminds me of that notation -- that idea seems to have faded away (thank goodness for that, too), and I don't think we should let OE go there either. I'd rather take a small performance hit instead of having to remember even more rules about upper/lower case and other naming conventions. I vote to leave well enough alone... JMO. Mike (mwester)