From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zombie.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1PEeJDv017637 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:40:19 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by zombie.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m1PEeIa4009347 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:40:18 GMT Message-ID: <47C2D302.1060109@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:38:58 -0500 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav_Ovs=EDk?= CC: "Christopher J. PeBenito" , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, selinux-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: Re: refpolicy: patch for ldconfig from glibc 2.7 References: <20080222152703.GA4163@bobek.pm.i.cz> <1203703539.32061.22.camel@gorn> <20080225124131.GB31035@bobek.pm.i.cz> In-Reply-To: <20080225124131.GB31035@bobek.pm.i.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Václav Ovsík wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: >> This is the right fix, and basically the same fix is queued up for >> merging as part of Dan's patch set. > > Ok. Should I stop to send patches based on the Dan's Fedora policy? No if more people report it, it gives a better indication that the Fedora policy is correct. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkfC0wEACgkQrlYvE4MpobPqvwCfTSDwtfvtgxx22/efWEkoHNl3 0AoAoKNOvowl7D40y0p+3kqlahWuWe9/ =VhCD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.