From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <47C66DDB.90108@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:16:27 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <35d9c6ed0802262122l6565fbd1sb14c21feaa53789b@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <35d9c6ed0802262122l6565fbd1sb14c21feaa53789b@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8156C4A6B1EFC776F73CC21E" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] rtnet benchmark List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: sarra risto Cc: rtnet-users This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8156C4A6B1EFC776F73CC21E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Don't post to xenomai-commits, that's read-only for SVN commit. Also=20 note that there is the rtnet-user list, dedicated to RTnet discussions.=20 I'm moving this thread therefore.] sarra risto wrote: > hi > I just want to benchmark rtnet under xenomai and unit tests in order t= o > get performance and latency statics, I notice some people use netperf > software. I mean I am a newcomer, so I didn't find other software to > benchmark rtnet until now, do we really have other software for this > purpose, what parameters do we get? Before considering benchmarks: What scenario are you targeting with the=20 evaluation? Jan --------------enig8156C4A6B1EFC776F73CC21E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHxm3bniDOoMHTA+kRAleoAJ9Aza2+aADVbJ0BgMqQogAYeq+ynwCfeT01 NuVLgOeN93czcp2E1EK+xY4= =VY0f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8156C4A6B1EFC776F73CC21E--