From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUizS-00020h-Vw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:40:03 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUizQ-0001zf-6g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:40:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUizQ-0001zc-0M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:40:00 -0500 Received: from victor.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.26]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUizP-0002bV-P3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:39:59 -0500 Message-ID: <47C6B90C.4020308@novell.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:37:16 -0700 From: Pat Campbell MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Qemu-devel] bdrv_set_change_cb() /* XXX: no longer used */ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org In qemu 9.1 block.c I see: 794 /* XXX: no longer used */ 795 void bdrv_set_change_cb(BlockDriverState *bs, 796 void (*change_cb)(void *opaque), void *opaque) 797 { I also see that hw/ide.c and hw/sd.c call function bdrv_set_change_cb(). Is the comment wrong or is it an indicator that this function is going to be removed? Pat