From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH (resend)][EBTABLES]: Fix alignment checks in ebt_among.ko module.
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:48:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C7FF31.1060108@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C7C23C.2050100@openvz.org>
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> I've sent this patch some days ago to Bart, but with no answer...
>
> When trying to do
>
> # ebtables -A FORWARD --among-src 0:12:34:56:78:9a=192.168.0.10 -j ACCEPT
>
> on x86_64 box the ebt_among->check() callback warns me that
>
> ebtables: among: wrong size: 1060 against expected 1056, rounded to 1056
>
> Checking the ebtables sources, I found that the alignment is done
> differently in the tool and the kernel. Tool makes it like this:
>
> EBT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ebt_among_info)) + X
>
> while the kernel module like this:
>
> EBT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ebt_among_info) + X)
>
> So the suggested fix is to move the alignment in the kernel. After
> the fix the rule is added and appears in the ebtables -L output.
It seems the kernel is correct and userspace is doing it
wrong, so I think userspace should be fixed instead.
The problem with your patch is that is causes misalignment
for following structures that contain u64 members.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-29 8:28 [PATCH (resend)][EBTABLES]: Fix alignment checks in ebt_among.ko module Pavel Emelyanov
2008-02-29 12:48 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-02-29 15:40 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-29 17:23 ` Bart De Schuymer
2008-02-29 18:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-02 15:12 ` Bart De Schuymer
2008-03-03 8:50 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C7FF31.1060108@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.