From: "Tor Arne Vestbø" <torarnv@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Creating RAID5 with four devices and end up with 5 (one removed and one spare). Why?
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:55:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CBBD11.4020501@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi!
I'm trying to build a Linux RAID5 with four (4) 750GB disks, but not
matter what I do I end up with mdadm listing five (5) devices and
telling me that one of them is a spare, and another one is
failed/removed. I've been googling and reading HOWTOs for a week now,
but can't figure it out. Here's what I do:
monstre:~/buildroot # mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=4
/dev/sd[cdef]1
mdadm: /dev/sdc1 appears to contain an ext2fs file system
size=-2097251968K mtime=Wed Feb 27 00:26:57 2008
mdadm: /dev/sdc1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid5 devices=4 ctime=Tue Feb 26 20:47:24 2008
mdadm: /dev/sdd1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid5 devices=4 ctime=Tue Feb 26 20:47:24 2008
mdadm: /dev/sde1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid5 devices=4 ctime=Tue Feb 26 20:47:24 2008
mdadm: /dev/sdf1 appears to contain an ext2fs file system
size=-1560381056K mtime=Wed Feb 27 00:26:57 2008
mdadm: /dev/sdf1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid5 devices=4 ctime=Tue Feb 26 20:47:24 2008
Continue creating array? y
mdadm: array /dev/md0 started.
monstre:~/buildroot # cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active(auto-read-only) raid5 sdf1[4](S) sde1[2] sdd1[1] sdc1[0]
2197715712 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [UUU_]
unused devices: <none>
monstre:~/buildroot # mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.03
Creation Time : Tue Feb 26 20:57:46 2008
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 2197715712 (2095.91 GiB 2250.46 GB)
Used Dev Size : 732571904 (698.64 GiB 750.15 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Tue Feb 26 20:57:46 2008
State : clean, degraded
Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 1
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
UUID : 8b498455:0ab45ac1:ebf26e3f:56a9fc2f
Events : 0.1
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 33 0 active sync /dev/sdc1
1 8 49 1 active sync /dev/sdd1
2 8 65 2 active sync /dev/sde1
3 0 0 3 removed
4 8 81 - spare /dev/sdf1
monstre: # mdadm --examine /dev/sdd1
/dev/sdd1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
UUID : a0186556:4ffb5a2a:822f8875:94ae7d2c
Creation Time : Sun Mar 2 22:52:53 2008
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 732571904 (698.64 GiB 750.15 GB)
Array Size : 2197715712 (2095.91 GiB 2250.46 GB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Preferred Minor : 0
Update Time : Sun Mar 2 22:59:54 2008
State : clean
Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 1
Spare Devices : 1
Checksum : 6b5e8442 - correct
Events : 0.22
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 8 49 1 active sync /dev/sdd1
0 0 8 33 0 active sync /dev/sdc1
1 1 8 49 1 active sync /dev/sdd1
2 2 8 65 2 active sync /dev/sde1
3 3 0 0 3 faulty removed
4 4 8 81 4 spare /dev/sdf1
-------------------
So what i don't get is:
1. Why is mdadm --examine listing "3 3 0 0 3
faulty removed" and telling me I have a failed device?
2. Why is one of the actual disks (sdf) used as a spare, even though I
didn't ask for it?
Thanks for any tips or insights which may put me on the right track :)
Tor Arne
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-03 8:55 Tor Arne Vestbø [this message]
2008-03-03 9:19 ` Creating RAID5 with four devices and end up with 5 (one removed and one spare). Why? Robin Hill
2008-03-03 9:29 ` Tor Arne Vestbø
2008-03-03 9:55 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2008-03-03 10:01 ` Tor Arne Vestbø
2008-03-04 9:47 ` Tor Arne Vestbø
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47CBBD11.4020501@gmail.com \
--to=torarnv@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.