From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-pack-objects: Automatically pack annotated tags if object was packed Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:27:22 +0100 Message-ID: <47CCF9DA.4050304@viscovery.net> References: <20080304023607.GA16152@spearce.org> <20080304030658.GO8410@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Barkalow To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 04 08:28:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWRZO-0000B1-Ex for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:28:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757453AbYCDH1b (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:27:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757403AbYCDH1b (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:27:31 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:45974 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751210AbYCDH1b (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:27:31 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1JWRXy-0000dg-Kk; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:26:46 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.42]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C52F546; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:27:22 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <20080304030658.GO8410@spearce.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_99=3.5 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn O. Pearce schrieb: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: >> >>> The new option "--auto-follow-tags" allows the caller to request that >>> any annotated tag be included into the packfile if the object the tag >>> references was also included as part of the packfile. >> Wouldn't "auto-include-tag" a better name for this option? > > Ooooh. Indeed it would! > > I shall respin this series based around this better name. More bikeshedding: Why are you calling it "auto-"? If I tell the program to "--include-tags", I expect it to happen automatically. -- Hannes