From: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP IPv4 strange retransmits
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:31:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CD5D43.9020408@nets.rwth-aachen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803041507001.5423@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
Hi,
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>
>> I'm observing some retransmits with kernel 2.6.24.2, which I don't
>> understand. For instance in this cutout[1] of a sequence diagram which
>> was captured[2] on the TCP sender, 4 retransmits are made.
>
> They don't correspond to each other?
Hmm, they should.
>
>> According to netstat -st output[3][4] all those 4 retransmits were "fast
>> retransmit".
>> But there are no three DUPACKs which I expected would be needed for fast
>> retransmit?
>
> With FACK it's enough that you have fackets_out > tp->reordering
> (=dupThresh).
If it is FACK shouldn't it be accounted for LINUX_MIB_TCPFORWARDRETRANS
instead of LINUX_MIB_TCPFASTRETRANS?
>
>> Also interesting all retransmits happen _after_ those segments were
>> already acked and sacked, internal queuing or latency issues?
>
> I think your viewer is doing something wrong, sender.dump is not giving
> such information (or you draw that from wrong end?). Or it just draws
> DSACK like that?
Viewer is tcptrace and xplot. So nothing special at all.
You see it also in wireshark, if you draw a sequence diagram.
You also see it in wireshark if you sort by capture timestamp. I always thought
that capture timestamp order is correct and not dump order, but maybe I'm wrong?
Tcpdump:
12:08:20.667538 IP 192.168.0.7.33824 > 192.168.0.5.50139: . ack 23485 win 22720 <nop,nop,timestamp 969759 972885,nop,nop,sack 2 {24905:26325}{27745:29165}>
^^^^^ got acked at .667538
12:08:20.646749 IP 192.168.0.5.50139 > 192.168.0.7.33824: . 22065:23485(1420) ack 1 win 2864 <nop,nop,timestamp 972885 969754>
^^^^^ got retransmitted at .646749
>
>> It would be great if somebody could shed some light on this,
>> why those segments are retransmitted.
>> Dumps and xplots are available here[5].
>
> ...I quickly glanced over it and found no strange behavior in
> the sender.dump.
Best regards,
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-04 13:00 TCP IPv4 strange retransmits Arnd Hannemann
2008-03-04 13:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-03-04 14:31 ` Arnd Hannemann [this message]
2008-03-04 21:04 ` H. Willstrand
2008-03-04 22:41 ` Arnd Hannemann
2008-03-04 21:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-03-04 21:19 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-03-04 23:03 ` Arnd Hannemann
2008-03-05 7:00 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-03-05 13:04 ` Arnd Hannemann
2008-03-05 19:32 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47CD5D43.9020408@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
--to=hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.