From: John Dennis <jdennis@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix acct quoting in audit_log_acct_message())
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:41:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CDB416.7070303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1204658129.3216.118.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Eric Paris wrote:
> But I admit, the parser would have to know that key is a string to
> change it back.
Adding two bytes to each string field (beginning and ending delimiters)
is too big a burden? Instead we have to rely on difficult to manage
tables to tell the parser it's a string? The 2 byte penalty might have
had weight in 1970, but not in 2007.
If we're really arguing over how many bytes a record consumes then we
should switch to a binary protocol instead of text. Oh and by the way,
in a binary protocol you would likely prefix string data with a length
field, so you're going to end up using a couple of bytes anyway.
--
John Dennis <jdennis@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-04 3:50 [PATCH] Fix acct quoting in audit_log_acct_message()) Miloslav Trmac
2008-03-04 15:07 ` John Dennis
2008-03-04 18:10 ` Tomas Mraz
2008-03-04 18:29 ` John Dennis
2008-03-04 19:05 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-05 4:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-03-05 13:15 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-04 18:56 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-04 19:08 ` Miloslav Trmac
2008-03-04 19:28 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-04 19:15 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-04 20:41 ` John Dennis [this message]
2008-03-04 20:29 ` John Dennis
2008-03-04 20:36 ` Tomas Mraz
2008-03-04 20:57 ` John Dennis
2008-03-04 20:43 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-04 20:52 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-04 21:21 ` John Dennis
2008-03-04 21:38 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-04 21:55 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-04 22:03 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-04 22:18 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-04 22:32 ` John Dennis
2008-03-05 14:11 ` John Dennis
2008-03-04 22:14 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-04 22:21 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-04 23:00 ` Steve Grubb
2008-03-09 18:36 ` Steve Grubb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-05 13:55 Miloslav Trmac
2008-03-05 14:11 ` Tomas Mraz
2008-03-05 15:04 ` John Dennis
2008-03-05 15:21 ` Tomas Mraz
2008-03-05 15:29 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47CDB416.7070303@redhat.com \
--to=jdennis@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.