From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <47CEA5FD.4080202@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:54:05 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47CE8544.9070800@domain.hid> <47CE9A92.10206@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Shared IRQ issue with Xeno Peak PCI CAN driver List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Klaas Gadeyne Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Klaas Gadeyne wrote: > --- rtcan_sja1000.c (revision 3533) > +++ rtcan_sja1000.c (working copy) > @@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ > if (ret) { > printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR %d: IRQ %d is %s!\n", > ret, chip->irq_num, ret == -EBUSY ? > - "busy, check shared interrupt support" : "invalid"); > + "busy. If you have a card with > 1 channel, check if CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SHIRQ* is set" : "invalid"); > return ret; > } > > Not kernel coding style, I know :-) #ifndef CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SHIRQ printk("Enable CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SHIRQ") ? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux