From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Spurious completions during NCQ Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:56:27 +0900 Message-ID: <47CF878B.8090101@gmail.com> References: <20080215134658.GB27745@vlad.carfax.org.uk> <47B6EE53.1070101@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.184]:8260 "EHLO rn-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753122AbYCFF4j (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:56:39 -0500 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id v46so751702rnb.15 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:56:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47B6EE53.1070101@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Hugo Mills , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Mark Lord wrote: > Tejun, have the spurious completion fixes been backported > to 2.6.23 / 2.6.22 yet ? Those kernels will be in common use > for some time to come, and this fix is more or less essential. Not that I know of. I'm prepping patches now. Thanks. -- tejun