From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Spurious completions during NCQ Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:05:01 +0900 Message-ID: <47CF898D.8060902@gmail.com> References: <20080215134658.GB27745@vlad.carfax.org.uk> <47B6EE53.1070101@rtr.ca> <47CF878B.8090101@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.188]:24910 "EHLO rn-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752239AbYCFGFJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 01:05:09 -0500 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id v46so755616rnb.15 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:05:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47CF878B.8090101@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Hugo Mills , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Mark Lord wrote: >> Tejun, have the spurious completion fixes been backported >> to 2.6.23 / 2.6.22 yet ? Those kernels will be in common use >> for some time to come, and this fix is more or less essential. > > Not that I know of. I'm prepping patches now. > Oh... it already happened in 2.6.22.15 and 2.6.23.10. Nice. -- tejun