From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@analogic.com>
Cc: Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit AMD panic
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:41:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D01EB5.5080101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0803031205030.5874@chaos.analogic.com>
linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We have 64-bit production machines that use the kernel shipped with
> a RedHat distribution, linux-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4smp. There have been
> no problems until we received recent hardware. With the latest hardware,
> which the vendor claims hasn't changed, the machines panic when either
> a USB mouse or USB keyboard are plugged in.
>
> Machine:
>
> Supermicro H8DME-2
> Two quad-Core AMD Opteron CPUs
> 64GB DDR2 400 SDRAM
> 6 SATA2 3.0Gb/s HD Support
> 2 64-bit 133/100 MHz PCI-X
> 2 64=bit 100MHz PCI-X
> ATI ES1000 Graphics
>
> Chipset nVida MCP55 Pro
> NEC uPD720400
> USB FUCI, uses ohci_hcd driver.
>
> When mouse or keyboard is inserted, I get a panic with:
> "map_single bounce buffer is not DMA'ble."
>
> This comes from: linux-2.6.11-prep/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c,
> line 440. I added 64-bit long print hex to the panic statement
> so I could display the address it doesn't like.
You're using an Itanium kernel on Opteron?
> The address it doesn't like is: 0x000000022a0aa000
>
> Does anybody have a clue what might be the matter and how to fix it?
If the hardware "didn't change" then it could be a BIOS bug, or just a
different BIOS behavior that your old kernel doesn't handle well. Try
the same version you had on the old hardware. I once had a desktop box
that developed a similar behavior when I twiddled the memory hole
remapping settings in the BIOS.
-- Chris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-06 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-03 17:06 64-bit AMD panic linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2008-03-03 18:45 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-03 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-03 22:10 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2008-03-03 22:21 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-04 0:11 ` Jesper Juhl
2008-03-04 14:21 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2008-03-06 16:41 ` Chris Snook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D01EB5.5080101@redhat.com \
--to=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.