From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [212.60.202.196] (helo=mail.kernelconcepts.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JY1I1-0004GS-NI for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:48:51 +0100 Received: from [212.60.202.194] (helo=[192.168.2.131]) by mail.kernelconcepts.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JY1lR-0007o6-M0 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:19:13 +0100 Message-ID: <47D2B500.4040709@kernelconcepts.de> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:47:12 +0100 From: Florian Boor User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1204740661.8110.135.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1204748655.8110.174.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <47D1C285.2000703@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47D1C285.2000703@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 212.60.202.196 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: florian.boor@kernelconcepts.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: sdk.bbclass and gcc-cross-sdk X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:48:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Esben Haabendal schrieb: > I would love to see canadian cross support in OE. It would save me the > effort maintaining an OE hacked up to build a standard meta-toolchain > target. that would be a good feature. It might be useful for solving a similar situation I ran into several times: Building more compatible toolchains. This solution could be used to build a toolchain that runs on multiple distributions without the need to choose a particular distribution on the build machine. > If there is interest in it, I wouldn't mind working on this issue. And > if I am the only one interested in it, I might want to do it anyway. > Just for fun :-) I'm quite sure that there are quite some people out there who would appreciate this. These poor guys who have to develop for Linux devices using Windows just come to my mind - I guess they would love to see others building shiny new crosstoolchains for their Windows :-) Greetings Florian -- The dream of yesterday Florian Boor is the hope of today Tel: +49 271-771091-15 and the reality of tomorrow. Fax: +49 271-771091-19 [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904] florian.boor@kernelconcepts.de 1D78 2D4D 6C53 1CA4 5588 D07B A8E7 940C 25B7 9A76