From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from holly.castlecore.com ([89.21.8.102]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JY74R-0007LP-Bz for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:59:11 +0100 Message-ID: <47D30C5A.2080207@philpem.me.uk> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:59:54 +0000 From: Philip Pemberton MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Matthews References: <47D0EA5B.8040105@philpem.me.uk> <47D14C71.5040400@prolingua.co.uk> <47D308EB.30408@philpem.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <47D308EB.30408@philpem.me.uk> Cc: linux-dvb Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Updated scan file for uk-EmleyMoor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: Philip Pemberton wrote: > rights Mux A (650MHz, C43) should be disappearing as it's the weakest... this UKFreeTV is wrong again.. Mux D should be disappearing first, because it most certainly IS the weakest at only 4kW ERP vs. the 10kW ERP of the other muxes... Grr.. My point still stands though - why should one tuner pick up a different set of muxes when both are fed from the same signal? -- Phil. | (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny lists@philpem.me.uk | (='.'=) into your signature to help him gain http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | (")_(") world domination. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb