From: Bas van Schaik <bas@tuxes.nl>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Restore LVM snapshot without creating a full dump to an "external" device?
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:59:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D50670.7030006@tuxes.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080309233123.GA6688@racke.local>
Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:05:45PM +0100, Bas van Schaik wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> When I started to use LVM snapshots, I presumed that it was easy to
>> restore a system to such a snapshot. As far as I can see now, this
>> presumption was incorrect... People on the internet write that I should
>> dump the whole snapshot using dd and then write it over the original
>> volume. This actually implies that I need another device with at least
>> the size of the original volume available to dump to. In my situation,
>> this means that I need about 2 TB free space to recover this snapshot!
>>
>> Isn't there a more sophisticated way to restore the snapshot than just
>> dumping it?
>> 1) create snapshot of /dev/myvolumegroup/myvolume to
>> /dev/myvolumegroup/mysnapshot
>> 2) dd if=/dev/myvolumegroup/mysnapshot of=/tmp/mysnapshot.dd
>> 3) lvremove /dev/myvolumegroup/mysnapshot
>> 4) dd if=/tmp/mysnapshot.dd of=/dev/myvolumegroup/myvolume
>>
>
> you got (size-of-your-volume) free space in /tmp?
> pretty large /tmp, or pretty small volume, I guess.
>
>
>> Something like:
>> 1) lvrevert /dev/myvolumegroup/mysnapshot /dev/myvolumegroup/myvolume
>>
>> I'd like to hear your thoughts on this, because I think it should be
>> fairly easy to restore a COW snapshot. Or am I wrong and missing something?
>>
>
> you may want to investigate the status of
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StatelessLinux/CachedClient
> were it says "The LVM and device-mapper code to allow merging is
> awaiting upstream review."
>
Interesting project, interesting information, but it was last updated
2007-10-19. I'll try Googling for a more recent status, if that is
available...
> or you can try, at your own risk, the hack below.
>
> (... lots of excellent details ...)
Sounds very plausible, but there are some risks involved here ;). Thanks
anyhow, I'll really consider using your perl script when the situation
gets critical here...
-- Bas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-10 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-09 22:05 [linux-lvm] Restore LVM snapshot without creating a full dump to an "external" device? Bas van Schaik
2008-03-09 23:31 ` Lars Ellenberg
2008-03-10 9:59 ` Bas van Schaik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D50670.7030006@tuxes.nl \
--to=bas@tuxes.nl \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.