Re: [QUESTION] Selective fetch possible?

[Rogan Dawes <lists@dawes.za.net>]

Jakub Narebski wrote:
> "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> 
>> Filippo Zangheri <filippo.zangheri@yahoo.it> wrote:
>>> Is it possible to git-fetch only a portion of the tree
>>> of the specified repository, say, fetch only one directory or a
>>> subset of files matching some regular expression? This is currently
>>> - to my knowledge - only possible via wget iff the GIT repository
>>> has gitweb enabled. But that's just a workaround.
>> No.
>>
>> You can use a shallow clone to fetch only X commits back into
>> history on any branch, and you can also manually configure the
>> fetch specification in .git/config to only fetch specific branches,
>> but you must fetch the entire tree to get any of the files in it.
>>
>> If the repository is available by git:// protocol you may be able
>> to use git-archive to obtain a tarfile for just the directory you
>> want (service has to be enabled on the remote side) but that is
>> just a raw UNIX tar; there is no Git repository and no ability to
>> commit/fetch/push/diff/apply/log/etc.
> 
> Note that what you wanted is, I guess, something called partial
> checkout or subtree checkout.  This feature appears now and then in
> feature requests; lately Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy (pclouds) offered to do
> this in "on subtree checkout" thread:
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/74915

I still believe that it could be done fairly easily by simply recording 
the SHA1's of the files and directories that are *not* checked out 
somewhere in the .git directory, and just reusing those when checking 
the working tree. i.e. rather than stat-ing a tree that was never 
checked out, get the known SHA1 for that tree from where it was recorded 
on checkout.

> The problem is twofold, as far as I understand it.  First, what to do
> if there is merge conflicts outside checked out (selected) directory?

This is something that has been repeated many times, and I fail to see 
how it can be an issue. How can there be a conflict in a directory that 
is not, and never has been, checked out, and therefore cannot have been 
modified?

The only possibility that I can see is if the directory has been renamed 
elsewhere, but in that case, it *is* effectively checked out (just with 
a different directory name).

> Second, how to make repository contain only relevant objects: git in
> many places assumes full connectivity, and that if it has an object it
> hass all objects depending on it.
> 

Yes, this is the big problem as I see it.

Rogan