All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move memory controller allocations to their own slabs (v2)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:11:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D63E9D.70500@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080311061836.6664.5072.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

Balbir Singh wrote:
> Move the memory controller data structure page_cgroup to its own slab cache.
> It saves space on the system, allocations are not necessarily pushed to order
> of 2 and should provide performance benefits. Users who disable the memory
> controller can also double check that the memory controller is not allocating
> page_cgroup's.

Can you, please, check how many objects-per-page we have with and 
without this patch for SLAB and SLUB?

Thanks.

> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c |   12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab mm/memcontrol.c
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc4/mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab	2008-03-10 23:22:34.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc4-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c	2008-03-11 10:29:00.000000000 +0530
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
>  #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/swap.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
> @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
>  
>  struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys;
>  static const int MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES = 5;
> +static struct kmem_cache *page_cgroup_cache;
>  
>  /*
>   * Statistics for memory cgroup.
> @@ -560,7 +562,7 @@ retry:
>  	}
>  	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
>  
> -	pc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page_cgroup), gfp_mask);
> +	pc = kmem_cache_zalloc(page_cgroup_cache, gfp_mask);
>  	if (pc == NULL)
>  		goto err;
>  
> @@ -622,7 +624,7 @@ retry:
>  		 */
>  		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
>  		css_put(&mem->css);
> -		kfree(pc);
> +		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
>  		goto retry;
>  	}
>  	page_assign_page_cgroup(page, pc);
> @@ -637,7 +639,7 @@ done:
>  	return 0;
>  out:
>  	css_put(&mem->css);
> -	kfree(pc);
> +	kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
>  err:
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
> @@ -695,7 +697,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct pag
>  		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
>  		css_put(&mem->css);
>  
> -		kfree(pc);
> +		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1020,6 +1022,8 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
>  	if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
>  		mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
>  		init_mm.mem_cgroup = mem;
> +		page_cgroup_cache = KMEM_CACHE(page_cgroup,
> +					SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC);
>  	} else
>  		mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mem_cgroup), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
> diff -puN include/linux/memcontrol.h~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab include/linux/memcontrol.h
> _
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move memory controller allocations to their own slabs (v2)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:11:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D63E9D.70500@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080311061836.6664.5072.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

Balbir Singh wrote:
> Move the memory controller data structure page_cgroup to its own slab cache.
> It saves space on the system, allocations are not necessarily pushed to order
> of 2 and should provide performance benefits. Users who disable the memory
> controller can also double check that the memory controller is not allocating
> page_cgroup's.

Can you, please, check how many objects-per-page we have with and 
without this patch for SLAB and SLUB?

Thanks.

> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c |   12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab mm/memcontrol.c
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc4/mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab	2008-03-10 23:22:34.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc4-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c	2008-03-11 10:29:00.000000000 +0530
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
>  #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/swap.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
> @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
>  
>  struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys;
>  static const int MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES = 5;
> +static struct kmem_cache *page_cgroup_cache;
>  
>  /*
>   * Statistics for memory cgroup.
> @@ -560,7 +562,7 @@ retry:
>  	}
>  	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
>  
> -	pc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page_cgroup), gfp_mask);
> +	pc = kmem_cache_zalloc(page_cgroup_cache, gfp_mask);
>  	if (pc == NULL)
>  		goto err;
>  
> @@ -622,7 +624,7 @@ retry:
>  		 */
>  		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
>  		css_put(&mem->css);
> -		kfree(pc);
> +		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
>  		goto retry;
>  	}
>  	page_assign_page_cgroup(page, pc);
> @@ -637,7 +639,7 @@ done:
>  	return 0;
>  out:
>  	css_put(&mem->css);
> -	kfree(pc);
> +	kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
>  err:
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
> @@ -695,7 +697,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct pag
>  		res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
>  		css_put(&mem->css);
>  
> -		kfree(pc);
> +		kmem_cache_free(page_cgroup_cache, pc);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1020,6 +1022,8 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *
>  	if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
>  		mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
>  		init_mm.mem_cgroup = mem;
> +		page_cgroup_cache = KMEM_CACHE(page_cgroup,
> +					SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC);
>  	} else
>  		mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mem_cgroup), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
> diff -puN include/linux/memcontrol.h~memory-controller-move-to-own-slab include/linux/memcontrol.h
> _
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-11  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-11  6:18 [PATCH] Move memory controller allocations to their own slabs (v2) Balbir Singh
2008-03-11  6:18 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-11  8:11 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2008-03-11  8:11   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-11  8:15   ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-11  8:15     ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-11  8:35     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-11  8:35       ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-11 11:09       ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-11 11:09         ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-11 13:05         ` Hugh Dickins
2008-03-11 13:05           ` Hugh Dickins
2008-03-12  3:38           ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-12  3:38             ` Nick Piggin
2008-03-12  3:48           ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-12  3:48             ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-11 12:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-03-11 12:55   ` Hugh Dickins
2008-03-11 18:47   ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-11 18:47     ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47D63E9D.70500@openvz.org \
    --to=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.