From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [212.227.126.174] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZXEA-0004md-SD for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:07:12 +0100 Received: from [10.0.0.200] (X135b.x.pppool.de [89.59.19.91]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwtQ-1JZXC60gbJ-0003xU; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:04:59 +0100 Message-ID: <47D83769.5020405@linuxdevelopment.de> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:04:57 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Robert_W=F6rle?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <200803121450.09688.geoffrey@pager.net> In-Reply-To: <200803121450.09688.geoffrey@pager.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19L/azIT1FEdqlKnKOG9Rf4GghRGHEbU+NRr7a +XYXHjh8uaRfYDwkbDUJ1Nb5ZOjGHjpeBFjbBvgXgQzk7/OWLa dTI0SGs3MbRm+6xgOfS+YAs5IE4n4pwxIyUOkqCpnA= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 212.227.126.174 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robert@linuxdevelopment.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Eureka! AVR32 ld-uClibc.so segfault solved X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:07:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > So I now have a working OE based AVR32 build system, using binutils > 2.17.atmel.0.0.99 20060623, gcc 4.2.1-atmel.1.0.3, and uClibc 0.9.29-atmel.1. > This is essentially the same as Atmel's buildroot-avr32-v2.1.0. As soon as I > clean stuff up a little, I'll submit patches for this via bugzilla. Minus > this uclibc.inc diff. I need more expert opinion on this. > > Thanks to all those who helped! > --- excellent job, can you supply any patches you have already, i would be more then happy to bring this up ( again !) rob_w