From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rene Herman Subject: Re: arecord | aplay expected delay Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:36:20 +0100 Message-ID: <47DD92D4.3010102@keyaccess.nl> References: <00d301c8874d$51773ea0$0202a8c0@uw4b58d8528225> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.201]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E64246DD for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:35:26 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <00d301c8874d$51773ea0$0202a8c0@uw4b58d8528225> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: van der Linden Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 16-03-08 11:05, van der Linden wrote: > I'm running arecord and aplay under uCLinux on a Blackfin DSP. > > In this way I loopback my audio. > > Does anyone know what delay I can expect between audio input and audio output? Not me, but you just want to loop without doing anything to it? An analogue input? Every card I know can just loop it's own inputs out again. That is, In -> Out, while you have In -> ADC -> bus -> cpu/memory -> bus -> DAC -> Out. > I measure at my test board 50ms. I want to have about 1ms! You'd need a pretty fast system I suppose. Why does your card not loop directly itself? You can still record it as well... Rene