From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [Ebtables-devel] [PATCH resend 1/2] Adds ebt_nflog watcher to kernel. Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:25:50 +0100 Message-ID: <47DE9B8E.2080802@trash.net> References: <20080205185521.051763000@andrew.endian.com> <20080205185617.732255000@andrew.endian.com> <47BD86EF.7060809@trash.net> <47C34933.8000301@endian.com> <1203981841.2959.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47DE9B79.3020502@endian.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bart De Schuymer , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, ebtables-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Peter Warasin Return-path: Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22]:8457 "EHLO viefep18-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751740AbYCQQel (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:34:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47DE9B79.3020502@endian.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Peter Warasin wrote: > Hi > > Bart De Schuymer wrote: >> Op di, 26-02-2008 te 00:03 +0100, schreef Peter Warasin: >>> I re-based on net-2.6.26 and changed what you mentioned. >>> Patch is attached >> It looks fine, I'm just wondering what the flags and the pad in struct >> ebt_nflog_info are for... > > I have not seen the submit on net-2.6.26 and in ebtables cvs. Is the > patch queued or is there something to do for me? I'm currently holding off netfilter 2.6.26 patches because there are some conflicts with the net-2.6.26 tree. I'll apply it once Dave has rebased to Linus' current tree.