From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from semihalf.com (semihalf.com [206.130.101.55]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77235DDED2 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:30:41 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <47DF7D6F.8010808@semihalf.com> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:29:35 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Sieka MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git References: <20080317222836.AFA66241A2@gemini.denx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev , rpurdie@rpsys.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: [...] >> It may be argued that this code should be moved somewhere else, but I >> don't remeber to have seen any such review comments. > > The LED code just hasn't been picked up. IIRC, it was reworked to > make it a proper driver in drivers/leds. Grant, Yes, the Motion-PRO LED driver has been reworked and posted: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?q=Motion-pro&id=16617 > I need to look at it again, > but it is a lot of code for a very simple thing and I wasn't sure if I > should be the one to pick it up because it is in drivers/leds which > has a different maintainer. I'm copying Richard Purdie who's listed as LED SUBSYSTEM maintainer. Richard -- could pick up the above mentioned Motion-PRO LED driver for upstream inclusion? It started as a MPC5200-specific thing posted to linuxppc-dev and got reviewed there, with the intent to go upstream via Grant (MPC52XX maintainer). However, it seems that it should be merged through your subsystem. Thanks, Bartlomiej