All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: bitops asm constraint fixes
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:19:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E112C7.8020406@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47DE44F6.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>

Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> That's not very desirable: For one part, because there are uses of
> bitops on arrays of ints (and casting these up isn't fully correct on
> x86-64 because of the same reason that using the bitops on char
> arrays isn't correct (see the other response I sent to Jeremy's reply),
> but also because operating on longs requires REX prefixes n x86-64,
> hence making the code bigger for no good reason.
> 

It might be worthwhile to find out if 64-bit bitops are faster.

Bitops are normally defined only on longs, but since x86 is a 
littleendian architecture we sometimes fudge that in arch-specific code.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-19 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-13  9:08 [RFC] x86: bitops asm constraint fixes Jan Beulich
2008-03-14  7:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-14  8:09   ` Jan Beulich
2008-03-14 18:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-17  9:08   ` Jan Beulich
2008-03-14 21:07 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-03-17  9:16   ` Jan Beulich
2008-03-19 13:19     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-03-21 13:54 ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-27  8:12 Jan Beulich
2008-03-27  8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-14 12:53   ` Jan Beulich
2008-03-28 19:55 Jan Beulich
2008-04-14 13:31 Jan Beulich
2008-04-14 16:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-15  7:03   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47E112C7.8020406@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.