From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [NETFILTER 02/02]: ipt_recent: sanity check hit count
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:55:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E2A507.6070409@trash.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: 02.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1968 bytes --]
commit be32bceccbf7051ff1433943df7e808c576d1191
Author: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com>
Date: Thu Mar 20 18:34:39 2008 +0100
[NETFILTER]: ipt_recent: sanity check hit count
If a rule using ipt_recent is created with a hit count greater than
ip_pkt_list_tot, the rule will never match as it cannot keep track
of enough timestamps. This patch makes ipt_recent refuse to create such
rules.
With ip_pkt_list_tot's default value of 20, the following can be used
to reproduce the problem.
nc -u -l 0.0.0.0 1234 &
for i in `seq 1 100`; do echo $i | nc -w 1 -u 127.0.0.1 1234; done
This limits it to 20 packets:
iptables -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 1234 -m recent --set --name test \
--rsource
iptables -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 1234 -m recent --update --seconds \
60 --hitcount 20 --name test --rsource -j DROP
While this is unlimited:
iptables -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 1234 -m recent --set --name test \
--rsource
iptables -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 1234 -m recent --update --seconds \
60 --hitcount 21 --name test --rsource -j DROP
With the patch the second rule-set will throw an EINVAL.
Reported-by: Sean Kennedy <skennedy@vcn.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c
index 68cbe3c..8e8f042 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c
@@ -252,6 +252,8 @@ recent_mt_check(const char *tablename, const void *ip,
if ((info->check_set & (IPT_RECENT_SET | IPT_RECENT_REMOVE)) &&
(info->seconds || info->hit_count))
return false;
+ if (info->hit_count > ip_pkt_list_tot)
+ return false;
if (info->name[0] == '\0' ||
strnlen(info->name, IPT_RECENT_NAME_LEN) == IPT_RECENT_NAME_LEN)
return false;
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-20 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-20 17:55 Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-03-20 22:07 ` [NETFILTER 02/02]: ipt_recent: sanity check hit count David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47E2A507.6070409@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.