From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Littell <littelld@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:48:08 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Add CONFIG_TOP_HIDE option to hide
 memory area that doesn't get "touched"
In-Reply-To: <1206098241-26134-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de>
References: <1206098241-26134-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de>
Message-ID: <47E3A078.7030809@verizon.net>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Stefan Roese wrote:
[deletia
> 
> diff --git a/include/configs/korat.h b/include/configs/korat.h
> index dcec9b0..c215c63 100644
> --- a/include/configs/korat.h
> +++ b/include/configs/korat.h
> @@ -144,6 +144,8 @@
>  #define SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS	{0x50}
>  #define CONFIG_PROG_SDRAM_TLB
>  #define CFG_DRAM_TEST
> +#define CONFIG_MEM_TOP_HIDE	256	/* don't use last 256 bytes	*/
> +					/* 440EPx errata CHIP 11	*/
>  

Hi all,

Please pardon my cluelessness, but should this be CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE
instead of CONFIG_MEM_TOP_HIDE?  I thought I remembered reading
somewhere (the top-level README?) that CONFIG_... things are switches
and CFG_... things are values.


Thanks,
Dave