From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow handling and cleanup
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:19:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E8D197.6030007@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD35CD1F8085945B597F80EEC8942138A24A9@exc01.bk.prodrive.nl>
Pieter Voorthuijsen wrote:
> Hi Dirk, Troy,
>
> Still some troubles on the DVEVM, i2c and flash are too fast, also dhcp is racing like h#ll. See log below.
>
> Currently the timer rolls over every 1 ms, this means get_timer should be called at least every ms to detect a roll over... Is it better to have a static variable timer than read the timer register directly?
>
> I see that this is standard behavior in other timer code in u-boot, but we don't need it I think. I'll try to implement the 64-bit timer without roll over this afternoon.
I don't love the idea of 64-bit timer! We *should* get it working with
32bit timer. Do you like spending the time to implement the 64-bit
timer instead in thinking/debugging the 32-bit timer?
E.g. what happens if you use
#define TIMER_LOAD_VAL 0xffffffff
instead in patch below?
Dirk
> Best regards, Pieter
>
>
>
> U-Boot > era 03EC0000 +20000
>
> Flash erase timeout at address 3ec0000 data b4f0b4f
> Flash erase timeout at address 3ed0000 data f4f0f4f
> done
> Erased 2 sectors
> U-Boot > iprobe
> Valid chip addresses: 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0B 0C 0D 0E 0F 10 11 12 13 1
> 4 15 16 17 18 19 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E
> 2F 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
> 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F 60 61 62 63 6
> 4 65 66 67 68 69 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E
> 7F
> U-Boot >
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dirk.behme at googlemail.com [mailto:dirk.behme at googlemail.com]
> Sent: maandag 24 maart 2008 15:58
> To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: troy.kisky at boundarydevices.com; Pieter Voorthuijsen
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow handling and cleanup
>
> Fix ARM based DaVinci DM644x timer overflow handling and cleanup timer code.
>
> Changes:
>
> - Remove *_masked() functions as noted by Wolfgang
>
> - Adapt register naming to recent TI spec (sprue26, March 2007)
>
> - Fix reset_timer() handling
>
> - As reported by Pieter [1] the overflow fix introduced a delay of factor 16 (e.g 2 seconds became 32). While the overflow fix is basically okay, it missed to divide CFG_HZ_CLOCK by 16, too. Fix this.
>
> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/38179
>
> - Remove software division of timer count value (DIV(x) macro) and do it in hardware (TIM_CLK_DIV).
>
> Many thanks to Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> for his hints!
>
> Patch is compile tested with davinci_dvevm & sonata & schmoogie configuration. Anybody can test it on real hardware? Pieter?
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@gmail.com>
>
> Index: uboot_davinci/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- uboot_davinci.orig/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c
> +++ uboot_davinci/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c
> @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@
>
> typedef volatile struct {
> u_int32_t pid12;
> - u_int32_t emumgt_clksped;
> - u_int32_t gpint_en;
> - u_int32_t gpdir_dat;
> + u_int32_t emumgt;
> + u_int32_t na1;
> + u_int32_t na2;
> u_int32_t tim12;
> u_int32_t tim34;
> u_int32_t prd12;
> @@ -52,21 +52,11 @@ typedef volatile struct {
> u_int32_t tcr;
> u_int32_t tgcr;
> u_int32_t wdtcr;
> - u_int32_t tlgc;
> - u_int32_t tlmr;
> } davinci_timer;
>
> davinci_timer *timer = (davinci_timer *)CFG_TIMERBASE;
>
> #define TIMER_LOAD_VAL (CFG_HZ_CLOCK / CFG_HZ)
> -#define READ_TIMER timer->tim34
> -
> -/*
> - * Timer runs with CFG_HZ_CLOCK, currently 27MHz. To avoid wrap
> - * around of timestamp already after min ~159s, divide it, e.g. by 16.
> - * timestamp will then wrap around all min ~42min
> - */
> -#define DIV(x) ((x) >> 4)
>
> static ulong timestamp;
> static ulong lastinc;
> @@ -76,63 +66,51 @@ int timer_init(void)
> /* We are using timer34 in unchained 32-bit mode, full speed */
> timer->tcr = 0x0;
> timer->tgcr = 0x0;
> - timer->tgcr = 0x06;
> + timer->tgcr = 0x06 | ((TIM_CLK_DIV - 1) << 8);
> timer->tim34 = 0x0;
> timer->prd34 = TIMER_LOAD_VAL;
> lastinc = 0;
> - timer->tcr = 0x80 << 16;
> timestamp = 0;
> + timer->tcr = 2 << 22;
>
> return(0);
> }
>
> void reset_timer(void)
> {
> - reset_timer_masked();
> -}
> -
> -ulong get_timer(ulong base)
> -{
> - return(get_timer_masked() - base);
> -}
> -
> -void set_timer(ulong t)
> -{
> - timestamp = t;
> -}
> -
> -void udelay(unsigned long usec)
> -{
> - udelay_masked(usec);
> -}
> -
> -void reset_timer_masked(void)
> -{
> - lastinc = DIV(READ_TIMER);
> + timer->tcr = 0x0;
> + timer->tim34 = 0;
> + lastinc = 0;
> timestamp = 0;
> + timer->tcr = 2 << 22;
> }
>
> -ulong get_timer_raw(void)
> +static ulong get_timer_raw(void)
> {
> - ulong now = DIV(READ_TIMER);
> + ulong now = timer->tim34;
>
> if (now >= lastinc) {
> /* normal mode */
> timestamp += now - lastinc;
> } else {
> /* overflow ... */
> - timestamp += now + DIV(TIMER_LOAD_VAL) - lastinc;
> + timestamp += now + TIMER_LOAD_VAL - lastinc;
> }
> lastinc = now;
> return timestamp;
> }
>
> -ulong get_timer_masked(void)
> +ulong get_timer(ulong base)
> +{
> + return(get_timer_raw() - base);
> +}
> +
> +void set_timer(ulong t)
> {
> - return(get_timer_raw() / DIV(TIMER_LOAD_VAL));
> + timestamp = t;
> }
>
> -void udelay_masked(unsigned long usec)
> +void udelay(unsigned long usec)
> {
> ulong tmo;
> ulong endtime;
> @@ -165,8 +143,5 @@ unsigned long long get_ticks(void)
> */
> ulong get_tbclk(void)
> {
> - ulong tbclk;
> -
> - tbclk = CFG_HZ;
> - return(tbclk);
> + return CFG_HZ;
> }
> Index: uboot_davinci/include/configs/davinci_dvevm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- uboot_davinci.orig/include/configs/davinci_dvevm.h
> +++ uboot_davinci/include/configs/davinci_dvevm.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@
> #define CONFIG_ARM926EJS /* arm926ejs CPU core */
> #define CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ 297000000 /* Arm Clock frequency */
> #define CFG_TIMERBASE 0x01c21400 /* use timer 0 */
> -#define CFG_HZ_CLOCK 27000000 /* Timer Input clock freq */
> +#define TIM_CLK_DIV 16
> +#define CFG_HZ_CLOCK (27000000/TIM_CLK_DIV) /* Timer clock freq */
> #define CFG_HZ 1000
> /*====================================================*/
> /* EEPROM definitions for Atmel 24C256BN SEEPROM chip */
> Index: uboot_davinci/include/configs/davinci_schmoogie.h
> ===================================================================
> --- uboot_davinci.orig/include/configs/davinci_schmoogie.h
> +++ uboot_davinci/include/configs/davinci_schmoogie.h
> @@ -33,7 +33,8 @@
> #define CONFIG_ARM926EJS /* arm926ejs CPU core */
> #define CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ 297000000 /* Arm Clock frequency */
> #define CFG_TIMERBASE 0x01c21400 /* use timer 0 */
> -#define CFG_HZ_CLOCK 27000000 /* Timer Input clock freq */
> +#define TIM_CLK_DIV 16
> +#define CFG_HZ_CLOCK (27000000/TIM_CLK_DIV) /* Timer clock freq */
> #define CFG_HZ 1000
> /*=============*/
> /* Memory Info */
> Index: uboot_davinci/include/configs/davinci_sonata.h
> ===================================================================
> --- uboot_davinci.orig/include/configs/davinci_sonata.h
> +++ uboot_davinci/include/configs/davinci_sonata.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@
> #define CONFIG_ARM926EJS /* arm926ejs CPU core */
> #define CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ 297000000 /* Arm Clock frequency */
> #define CFG_TIMERBASE 0x01c21400 /* use timer 0 */
> -#define CFG_HZ_CLOCK 27000000 /* Timer Input clock freq */
> +#define TIM_CLK_DIV 16
> +#define CFG_HZ_CLOCK (27000000/TIM_CLK_DIV) /* Timer clock freq */
> #define CFG_HZ 1000
> /*====================================================*/
> /* EEPROM definitions for Atmel 24C256BN SEEPROM chip */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-25 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-24 14:58 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow handling and cleanup dirk.behme at googlemail.com
2008-03-25 10:06 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Pieter Voorthuijsen
2008-03-25 10:19 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2008-03-25 15:45 ` Pieter Voorthuijsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47E8D197.6030007@googlemail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.