From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Greg Scott <GregScott@InfraSupportEtc.com>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ebtables hook order anomaly
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:16:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E9F83B.1080503@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <925A849792280C4E80C5461017A4B8A226A028@mail733.InfraSupportEtc.com>
Greg Scott wrote:
>> Thats indeed inconsistent. I don't believe this has changed however,
>> the IPv4 POSTROUTING hook was always called from the bridge
>> POSTROUTING hook (with similar priorities).
>
> Well, OK - so I guess the most important question now is, are there any
> other behavior changes of this nature coming up so I can get ready for
> them in advance? I'm kind of hoping for no more rude midnight
> surprises. :)
Looking at feature-removal-schedule, not from my side :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-26 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-25 17:02 Ebtables hook order anomaly Greg Scott
2008-03-26 7:16 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-30 21:21 Greg Scott
2008-03-27 7:55 Greg Scott
2008-03-25 14:17 Greg Scott
2008-03-25 13:32 Greg Scott
2008-03-25 13:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-03-25 15:22 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-25 15:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-03-25 1:18 ebtables and iptables different behavior between 2.6.18 on fc6 and 2.6.23 on fc8 Greg Scott
2008-03-25 2:28 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-25 6:48 ` Ebtables hook order anomaly (was: ebtables and iptables different behavior between 2.6.18 on fc6 and 2.6.23 on fc8) Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-25 12:57 ` Ebtables hook order anomaly Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 14:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 14:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 14:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 15:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 15:12 ` Greg Scott
2008-04-09 16:11 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-09 16:18 ` Greg Scott
2008-04-09 15:05 ` Greg Scott
2008-04-09 15:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 15:21 ` Greg Scott
2008-04-09 15:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 15:39 ` Greg Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47E9F83B.1080503@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=GregScott@InfraSupportEtc.com \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.