From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <47EA4F65.7050600@domain.hid>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:28:05 -0400
From: "Steven A. Falco" <sfalco@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20080325224919.582BD243A7@domain.hid>
	<47EA14F7.7040004@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <47EA14F7.7040004@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai/SOLO - RTOS emulation for standard Linux
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org

I'll of course have to make my own tests, but I am curious - do folks
expect that Xenomai/SOLO will be able to equal the interrupt performance
of Xenomai/IPIPE?  I guess my intuition says that the IPIPE approach
would guarantee better interrupt response, but maybe my intuition is
completely wrong.  I'll try to post some results in a few weeks...

    Steve Falco