From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <47EAC155.4040206@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:34:13 +0100 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47EA99E8.8020007@licquia.org> In-Reply-To: <47EA99E8.8020007@licquia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] LSB 4.0 and printing List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jeff Licquia Cc: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org, lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org What can be added without problems is SANE, as this is in every common distro and with the strong trend on multi-function devices it is very important for hardware vendors to make driver packages. It also allows to expand the initiative on distribution-independent driver packages to scanners (including stand-alone devices). Doing uplifts, like CUPS 1.1.x -> 1.2.x is not possible as LSB 4.0 is based on the same enterprise distros as 3.2. Why not 3.3 then? We should raise the major number for new enterprise distros as base and the minor for a new LSB based on the same enterprise distros. WDYT? Any suggestions on what else to add to the printing requirements? We will also talk in Austin on the joint session of LSB and OpenPrinting about that subject. Till Jeff Licquia wrote: > The LSB 4.0 project plan > (https://www.linux-foundation.org/en/ProjectPlan40) has this to say > about printing requirements: > > "Requirements being worked on by Printing Workgroup." > > So I'm checking to see if this is, in fact true. Does the OpenPrinting > workgroup have any requirements they'd like to see in LSB 4.0? > _______________________________________________ > lsb-discuss mailing list > lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss >