From: Sergei Poselenov <sposelenov@emcraft.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Compatatibility of the JFFS2 code in 2.4.26 vs 2.4.25
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:09:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EB9C93.4050004@emcraft.com> (raw)
Hello all,
For our projects, we have two separate kernel trees
- 2.4.26 and 2.4.25. We have decided to unify the JFFS2
code by moving 2.4.25 to 2.4.26 (not otherwise, because
we made some bugfixes/enhancements in 2.4.25 JFFS2).
Are there any upward/downward compatibility issues?
Will the resultant code work with customers filesystems,
already created under 2.4.26?
Thanks a lot for any info.
Regards,
Sergei
reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47EB9C93.4050004@emcraft.com \
--to=sposelenov@emcraft.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.