From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <47EC280B.9020102@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:04:43 +0100
From: Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <47EA99E8.8020007@licquia.org> <47EAC155.4040206@gmail.com>
	<20080326222308.GB7202@mit.edu>
	<3F62CBEE02D6404E98C65934617EB582040A7A41@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<20080326232809.GD7202@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20080326232809.GD7202@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] LSB 4.0 and printing
List-Id: Printing architecture under linux
	<printing-architecture.lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/printing-architecture>,
	<mailto:printing-architecture-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/printing-architecture>
List-Post: <mailto:printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:printing-architecture-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/printing-architecture>,
	<mailto:printing-architecture-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org, lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Wichmann,
	Mats D" <mats.d.wichmann@intel.com>

Theodore Tso wrote:
> 
> So it would be difficult even if the newer (trial-use) version of the
> component is a strict superset of the mandatory component?
> 
> I can understand that if an interface has actually *changed* between
> the two versions, life would be hard; but if it's just a matter of
> marking some interface as trial-use, and others as required, would
> that still be hard?


About the CUPS interfaces I can say that nothing was removed between 
CUPS 1.1.x and 1.2.x. There are only new interfaces and features added.

    Till