From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:58:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] little initial performance measurement Message-Id: <47ED0792.7060006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: References: <47ED0581.5080201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <47ED0581.5080201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > A little Timing check: > sleep 30s vs. real clock 30s > Host: > Guest: TODO >=20 I know this test is very fuzzy, but it can give a feelign if timing is brok= en completely or not. I have seen systems with broken timing in the past an= d it can affect a lot of thing in weird ways :-) Host: bash-3.00# time sleep 30s real 0m30.026s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.000s real clock ~30sec Guest: bash-3.00# time sleep 30s real 0m32.680s user 0m1.556s sys 0m1.092s real clock ~32sec So basic timing is ok, the 2 extra seconds are from the rest of the app aro= und the sleep itself. --=20 Gr=FCsse / regards,=20 Christian Ehrhardt IBM Linux Technology Center, Open Virtualization ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ kvm-ppc-devel mailing list kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel