From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.36.80.91] (helo=mail.libertysurf.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JgGAO-0002Qa-EP for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:19:00 +0200 Received: from blini.bolloretelecom.eu (62.210.194.121) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.3.118.8) id 479F73A801899E91 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:14:57 +0200 Received: from [192.168.95.62] (unknown [192.168.95.62]) by blini.bolloretelecom.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42BA23E58 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:18:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <47F0AC84.6080005@bolloretelecom.eu> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:19:00 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVyZW15IExhaW7DqQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.13pre) Gecko/20080208 Thunderbird/1.5.0.14pre Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <47ED3CE1.7020000@bolloretelecom.eu> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Subject: Re: uImage generation: kernel.bbclass vs linux.inc X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:19:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Koen Kooi wrote: > Jeremy Lain=C3=A9 schreef: | With the recent changes to kernel.bbclass > it seems that uboot-mkimage is | called twice: | | linux.inc: > do_compile_append() | | 1/ uses uboot-mkimage to generate generates > arch/${ARCH}/boot/uImage > > That's needed to get the correct uImage packaged, some machines > have the uImage in the rootfs (don't turn on lzo in jffs2, uboot > doesn't like that). > I totally agree, the change to uImage needs to be done in time for it to be picked up by packaging. My point is I think we should: a/ move do_compile_append() into kernel.bbclass b/ in do_deploy() : not run uboot-mkimage since this has already been done during do_compile_append() > That raises the question how kexec handles uImage files and how we > can make it easy for people to generate uImage for flashing and > zImage for kexecing in the same build. > OK, we will have to look into this. > DATETIME in version strings should die, we have PR for that. If the > output changed, PR should have been bumped. Lazyness is not a > valid excuse for littering my deploydir with identical files with a > different timestamp each build. Your filesystem has mtime if you > really want to see a date. > I agree, I have commited this change. - -- Jeremy LAINE Bollor=C3=A9 telecom | 11bis, rue Scribe | F-75009 Paris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH8KyDCL1n3lVB9EYRAl2IAJ9sqVBp4OAgg55zzKCGuhyLk5Gq5QCfdrxB Ghj+IYQbuVPITyMIxR3DFc4=3D =3Dr441 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----