All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Smolorz <smolorz@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>,
	"Cornelius Köpp" <Cornelius.Koepp@domain.hid>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] latencys drifting into negative (Xenomai	2.4.2/2.4.3)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:00:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F37579.7080601@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F34C0D.6090809@domain.hid>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Cornelius Köpp wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I run the latency test from testsuite on several hard and software 
>> configurations. Running on Xenomai 2.4.2, Linux 2.6.24 the results 
>> shows a "strange" behavior: In Kernel mode (-t1) the latencys 
>> constantly linear decrease. See attached plot 
>> 'drifting_latencys_in_kernelmode.png' of latency test running 48h on 
>> Pentium3 700. This effect could be reproduced, even on other hardware 
>> (Pentium-M 1400).
> 
> As our P3 boards did not support APIC-based timing (IIRC), your kernel 
> has correctly disabled the related kernel support. But the Pentium M 
> should be fine. So could you check if we are seeing some TSC clocks vs. 
> PIT timer rounding issue by enabling the local APIC on the Pentium M?

There is no difference in enabling the local APIC on the Pentium M WRT 
this bug.

>> The usermode (-t0) did not show a drifting, but is influenced by a 
>> test ran in kernelmode before.
> 
> What do you mean with "is influenced"?

Cornelius saw the following behaviour: If the latency test was run in 
user space first, no drift appeared over time. If latency was run in 
kernel space (with the reported ngeative drift) a following latency test 
in user space showed also negative values but with no additional drift 
over time.

>> I talked with Sebastian Smolorz about this and he builds his own 
>> independent kernel-config to check. He got the same drifting-effect 
>> with Xenomai 2.4.2 and Xenomai 2.4.3 running latency over several 
>> hours. His kernel-config ist attached as 
>> 'config-2.6.24-xenomai-2.4.3__ssm'.
>>
>> Our kernel-configs are both based on a config used with Xenomai 2.3.4 
>> and Linux 2.6.20.15 without any drifting effects.
> 
> 2.3.x did not incorporate the new TSC-to-ns conversion. Maybe it is not 
> a PIC vs. APIC thing, but rather a rounding problem of larger TSC values 
> (that naturally show up when the system runs for a longer time).

This hint seems to point into the right direction. I tried out a 
modified pod_32.h (xnarch_tsc_to_ns() commented out) so that the old 
implementation in include/asm-generic/bits/pod.h was used. The drifting 
bug disappeared. So there seems so be a buggy x86-specific 
implementation of this routine.

-- 
Sebastian


  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-02 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-01 23:26 [Xenomai-core] latencys drifting into negative (Xenomai 2.4.2/2.4.3) Cornelius Köpp
2008-04-02  3:01 ` Tomas Kalibera
2008-04-02  9:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-02 12:00   ` Sebastian Smolorz [this message]
2008-04-02 12:28     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-02 12:46       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-02 13:00         ` Sebastian Smolorz
2008-04-02 15:28           ` Sebastian Smolorz
2008-04-02 15:58       ` Sebastian Smolorz
2008-04-02 16:05         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-02 16:24           ` Sebastian Smolorz
2008-04-03 12:17             ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-03 12:27               ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-03 12:50                 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-03 12:52                   ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-03 13:15               ` Sebastian Smolorz
2008-04-03 21:52                 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-04  8:23                   ` Sebastian Smolorz
2008-04-04 10:45                     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-04 13:18                       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-04 13:25                         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-04 13:32                           ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-04 13:32                           ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-04 13:57                             ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-04 14:09                               ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-04 14:33                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-04 15:48                                   ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-04 15:52                                     ` Philippe Gerum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47F37579.7080601@domain.hid \
    --to=smolorz@domain.hid \
    --cc=Cornelius.Koepp@domain.hid \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.