From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Mahoney Subject: Re: bad block management Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:14:11 -0400 Message-ID: <47F386A3.1000209@suse.com> References: <000801c8947d$0a28fba0$c755a8c0@jyotis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <000801c8947d$0a28fba0$c755a8c0@jyotis> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: jyotiv@tataelxsi.co.in Cc: 'Edward Shishkin' , ric@emc.com, 'Christian Kujau' , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 jyotiv wrote: > We are keeping in mind that hard drive, the user is using may not be > modern. > UDF what we have implemented is for hard disk with high capacity. These two statement seem conflicting. Best of luck, though. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH84ajLPWxlyuTD7IRAkUUAJ4+dA0haEXc62wb16hYtudjTtcDFwCeNx92 kcfvFCqU43f9nGrPftSPnx8= =1hys -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----