From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: netfilter discussion list <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ip6tables icmp conntracking on 2.6.18 vs 2.6.24
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:03:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F56259.6080203@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F56197.1000504@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
> martin f krafft a écrit :
>
>> It's
>> a different issue than what this thread is about: that pre-2.6.24
>> kernels don't seem to register OUTGOING packets in the connection
>> table.
>
> This is higly unlikely IMHO. People would have noticed it.
>
>> Or are you saying that if you ping6 from the machine with the
>> iptables rules to somewhere else, the echo-reply gets matched by
>> RELATED or ESTABLISHED?
>
> Yes, of course. The outgoing echo request is in the NEW state and the
> incoming echo reply is in the ESTABLISHED state. Same with an incoming
> echo request.
Oops, I forgot to mention :
# uname -r
2.6.20.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-03 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-02 21:26 ip6tables icmp conntracking on 2.6.18 vs 2.6.24 martin f krafft
2008-04-02 21:44 ` Petr Pisar
2008-04-02 21:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-02 22:05 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-03 8:18 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-03 9:29 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-04-03 9:36 ` Nicolas KOWALSKI
2008-04-03 10:26 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-03 15:07 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-04-03 15:23 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-03 23:00 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-04-03 23:03 ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
2008-04-04 8:50 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-04 16:19 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-04-08 13:15 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-03 15:35 ` Nicolas KOWALSKI
2008-04-03 15:38 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-03 15:48 ` Nicolas KOWALSKI
2008-04-04 8:51 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-04 8:57 ` Nicolas KOWALSKI
2008-04-04 11:04 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-04 11:59 ` Nicolas KOWALSKI
2008-04-04 12:39 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-04 17:57 ` Nicolas KOWALSKI
2008-04-03 16:14 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2008-04-04 6:22 ` martin f krafft
2008-04-04 9:39 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2008-04-04 7:32 ` RFC 4890 (icmpv6 firewall recommendations) and ip6tables (was: ip6tables icmp conntracking on 2.6.18 vs 2.6.24) martin f krafft
2008-04-04 9:12 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2008-04-04 11:15 ` martin f krafft
2009-03-11 12:44 ` martin f krafft
2009-03-21 13:43 ` RFC 4890 (icmpv6 firewall recommendations) and ip6tables Chris Hills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F56259.6080203@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--to=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.