All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Sigler <linux.kernel@free.fr>
To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Linux 11-minute mode (RTC update)
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:06:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F5E194.5040409@free.fr> (raw)

(Message also posted to comp.protocols.time.ntp and linux-kernel but 
since timers are involved, I figured I might have more luck here.)

Hello,

I run Linux kernel 2.6.22.1-rt9 and ntpd 4.2.4p0

# adjtimex --print
          mode: 0
        offset: 77
     frequency: -1309904
      maxerror: 493576
      esterror: 50
        status: 1
time_constant: 6
     precision: 1
     tolerance: 33554432
          tick: 10000
      raw time:  1207230744s 183249us = 1207230744.183249

In my setup, STA_UNSYNC (0x0040, clock unsynchronized) is 0.

Thus, ntp_synced() returns 1.

Thus the kernel should write the system time to the RTC every
11 minutes; but it does not.

The relevant code is in sync_cmos_clock()

http://lxr.linux.no/linux/kernel/time/ntp.c#L188

I've added several printk() to this function, and it appears
that it is never called.

The relevant timer is defined with the following macro.

static DEFINE_TIMER(sync_cmos_timer, sync_cmos_clock, 0, 0);

which expands to

static struct timer_list sync_cmos_timer =
{
   .function = sync_cmos_clock,
   .expires  = 0,
   .data     = 0,
   .base     = &boot_tvec_bases
};

The problem seems to be that this timer is never armed, to bootstrap
the process. It seems there should be a call to mod_timer() somewhere.

do_adjtimex() calls notify_cmos_timer() unconditionally.

static void notify_cmos_timer(void)
{
   if (no_sync_cmos_clock)
     mod_timer(&sync_cmos_timer, jiffies + 1);
}

What are the semantics of notify_cmos_timer?
What is it supposed to do?

And what is 'no_sync_cmos_clock' supposed to mean?
/* Disable the cmos update - used by virtualization and embedded */
int no_sync_cmos_clock  __read_mostly;
Why would we (re)arm the timer when 'no_sync_cmos_clock' is true?

I'd be grateful for anyone sharing their knowledge.

Regards.


             reply	other threads:[~2008-04-04  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-04  8:06 John Sigler [this message]
2008-04-04  9:22 ` Linux 11-minute mode (RTC update) John Sigler
2008-04-05 17:54   ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-04 20:20 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-03 14:46 John Sigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47F5E194.5040409@free.fr \
    --to=linux.kernel@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.