From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751898AbYDDU5g (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:57:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751247AbYDDU52 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:57:28 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:39030 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751143AbYDDU51 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:57:27 -0400 Message-ID: <47F69621.3080105@garzik.org> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:57:05 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: Linus Torvalds , LKML , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.25 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Gleixner wrote: > 1) drivers/char/hpet.c > include/linux/hpet.h > > due to the revert of the HPET irq assignemt, which was only affects x86. Related to this... check out jgarzik/misc-2.6.git#irq-cleanups and #irq-remove for my set of patches that remove the 'irq' argument from all irq handlers. I have a couple cleanup patches for HPET that should go in prior to the big "remove irq argument" massive change (even if people don't want to remove the 'irq' argument ultimately, the cleanup is still useful) Who is the HPET maintainer these days, if anyone? Jeff