From: gavron@wetwork.net
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] b43: We need lots of regression testing
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 03:48:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F758E7.3050306@wetwork.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1207364787.2115.16.camel@dv>
I had a case of total disassociation last night, and it is unusual. NM
was unable to reconnect (so we go to bash).
A scan revealed no APs but after a module reload they are back...
What further testing or other diagnostics can I run should this happen
again to rest?
Thanks
E
[root@egdell ~]# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 No scan results
[root@egdell ~]# rmmod b43
[root@egdell ~]# modprobe b43
[root@egdell ~]# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:16:01:B9:F9:3F
ESSID:"wetwork"
Mode:Master
Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)
Channel:6
Quality=71/100 Signal level=-64 dBm Noise
level=-69 dBm
Encryption key:on
Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s
11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s
48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s
Extra:tsf=00000266671a2b44
Cell 02 - Address: 00:16:01:B9:FE:8F
ESSID:"wetwork"
Mode:Master
Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)
Channel:6
Quality=98/100 Signal level=-36 dBm Noise
level=-69 dBm
Encryption key:on
Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s
11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s
48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s
Extra:tsf=000002cd08cbc1ce
Cell 03 - Address: 00:16:01:B9:F5:1F
ESSID:"wetwork"
Mode:Master
Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)
Channel:6
Quality=61/100 Signal level=-74 dBm Noise
level=-69 dBm
Encryption key:on
Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s
11 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s
48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s
Extra:tsf=0000021011e7a0e7
[root@egdell ~]#
Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 16:12 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
>
>> Hi b43 users,
>>
>> Please be so kind to run lots of regression tests on the following
>> patch. This patch is supposed to make the LO calibration a _lot_ more
>> lightweight and avoid a long MAC-disable period every 120 seconds.
>>
>> We need a lot of regression testing with this patch on lots of different
>> devices to make sure we don't introduce regressions.
>>
>> I tested this on a 4306 and a 4318 card. So far it seems to work great
>> on these cards.
>>
>
> Tested on this:
>
> b43-phy0: Broadcom 4306 WLAN found
> b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 2, Type 2, Revision 2
> b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2050, Revision 2
> phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid'
> Broadcom 43xx driver loaded [ Features: PMLR, Firmware-ID: FW13 ]
>
> It's actually Fedora development kernel 2.6.25-0.195.rc8.git1.fc9.i686
> with patched compat-wireless installed.
>
> It's working better than I could possibly expect. The range is on the
> par with another laptop with ipw3945 running Linux or Windows XP. It's
> working through 4 walls and 30 meters on top of that. I understand that
> there are many random factors involved, but my impression is very
> positive. Basically, it's good enough to go outside with the laptop
> without having an AP installed near a window. I haven't seen any
> significant interruptions in the connection.
>
> Unfortunately, I hit that nasty circular lock dependency bug (already
> discussed in another thread) when I killed wpa_supplicant to try another
> AP. The CPU utilization went to 100%, but the driver kept working.
>
> Another unrelated bug (sorry, testing often finds unrelated bugs) is
> that scanning with specific ESSID was returning non-matching APs. I
> mean "iwlist wlan0 scan my_essid", which would still report many
> different ESSIDs. It's inconvenient when the driver can sense 22 APs at
> once :)
>
> I'll try to get 4318 tested over the weekend.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-05 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 14:12 [PATCH RFT] b43: We need lots of regression testing Michael Buesch
2008-04-04 20:01 ` gavron
2008-04-04 20:02 ` Michael Buesch
2008-04-05 3:06 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-04-05 9:09 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-06 5:12 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-04-05 10:48 ` gavron [this message]
2008-04-06 5:46 ` Pavel Roskin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-06 8:23 Ronald
2008-04-07 1:26 ` Pavel Roskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F758E7.3050306@wetwork.net \
--to=gavron@wetwork.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.