From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
magnus.damm@gmail.com, damm@igel.co.jp, lethal@linux-sh.org,
nico@cam.org, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Blackfin STAMP537 compiling error in 2.6.25-rc8
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:13:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F9D7BA.6080708@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <386072610804070057w1eb65db5taeca77f8f3e36627@mail.gmail.com>
Bryan Wu wrote:
> We found the latest kernel compile failed with Blackfin STAMP537
> configuration on our daily build machine.
> ---
> CC drivers/net/smc91x.o
> drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_rcv':
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:513: warning: passing argument 1 of 'insw' makes
> integer from pointer without a cast
> drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_hardware_send_pkt':
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:620: warning: passing argument 1 of 'outsw' makes
> integer from pointer without a cast
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859:32: error: macro "SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR" requires
> 2 arguments, but only 1 given
> drivers/net/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_probe':
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: 'SMC_GET_MAC_ADDR' undeclared (first
> use in this function)
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once
> drivers/net/smc91x.c:1859: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/smc91x.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> ---
>
> That is because my -mm tree fixing bug patch:
> (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9e6db60825ef7e7999abc610ce256ba768e58162)
> was merged into mainline before the smc91x API change patch in -mm:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/broken-out/smc91x-pass-along-private-data-v2.patch
>
> Did I miss something here? or this patch is on the way before 2.6.25
> final release?
It looks like I missed something... I thought akpm was going to send
the patch for -mm in?
If not, let's revert this one...
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-07 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-07 7:57 Blackfin STAMP537 compiling error in 2.6.25-rc8 Bryan Wu
2008-04-07 8:13 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-04-07 8:15 ` Bryan Wu
2008-04-07 20:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-07 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-08 2:08 ` Bryan Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F9D7BA.6080708@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cooloney@kernel.org \
--cc=damm@igel.co.jp \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.