From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
hugh@veritas.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:33:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FA0D85.201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080407120340.GB16647@one.firstfloor.org>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 05:21:37PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>> Due to the overhead of the memory controller. The
>> memory controller is now disabled by default. This patch changes
>> cgroup_disable to cgroup_toggle, so that each controller can decide
>> whether it wants to be enabled/disabled by default.
>>
>> If everyone agrees on this approach and likes it, should we push this
>> into 2.6.25?
>
> First I like the change to make it disabled by default.
>
> I don't think "toggle" is good semantics for a user visible switch
> because that changes the meaning when the kernel default changes
> (which it will likely once the current default overhead is fixed)
>
> It should be rather: cgroup=on/off
>
The boot control options apply to all controllers and we want to allow
controllers to decide whether they should be turned on or off. With sufficient
documentation support in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, don't you think we
can expect this to work as the user intended?
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-07 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-07 11:51 [-mm] Disable the memory controller by default Balbir Singh
2008-04-07 12:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-07 12:03 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-04-07 12:16 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-07 12:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-04-07 12:16 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-07 17:48 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-07 12:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FA0D85.201@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.