From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]" Subject: Add more debug output to sas_scsi_recover_host or sas_eh_handle_sas_errors Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:22:19 +0200 Message-ID: <47FA2E1B.6020709@ipax.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.ipax.at ([80.64.143.40]:36160 "EHLO mail.ipax.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755394AbYDGOWV (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:22:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.110] (vie-078-142-128-152.dsl.sil.at [78.142.128.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ipax.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084B84773CA for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:22:21 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, is there any sens in adding more debug output to sas_scsi_recover_host or sas_eh_handle_sas_errors? e.g. put out SAS_ADDR(task->dev->sas_addr) so that we know whether the error is always occuring on one phy/port/etc. ? the reason for doing this is basically my problems with the aic94xx driver, outlined in http://marc.info/?t=120603924200004. cheers, raoul - -- ____________________________________________________________________ DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. r.bhatia@ipax.at Technischer Leiter IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OEG web. http://www.ipax.at Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. office@ipax.at 1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030 FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15 ____________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH+i4bEaTXmVQ/cvsRAtLnAKCFPvCanPoq6+Fum4qqU3oR6/HXYACfQTBk f4zXUKWVFOtTrLNxOdMNFzI= =np9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----